Gaming on the late 2014 Mac mini is amazing It performs wonderfully when paying games. The monitor I am running is the Dell AW3418DW with 120mhz at 3440x1440. The problem mostly occurs in Apex where the drop in FPS for the 2070 has been quite bad. I have been playing Overwatch, Apex and Hitman 2. I paired the same Mac mini with my older MSI 1070 Armor and when it comes to FPS the 1070 has even surpassed the 2070 in some games.SATA III is a 6 gigabit transfer rate compared to the 3 gigabit that SATA II supports. The older 2018 mini supported up to three.The Mac Mini comes with a SATA II 5400 rpm hard drive - but the controller on the Mini will accept a SATA III drive. The other is forced to use HDMI.
How Fast Is The Mini 2015 For Gaming Mac Mini IsAn Intel-based mini with the same configuration as my 2018 mini, which has 1 TB less storage, is 2,099.With the introduction of super fast Thunderbird 3 ports on Macs and eGPU. At 1699, a fully-loaded M1 Mac mini is also an excellent value. It's an inconvenience for a specific niche of users, but it's a niche Apple has catered to in the past.The support page is right in line with my experience, showing that the new mini generates roughly one-third the thermal energy of my 2018 mini. While the average user may not have any need for a 10 gigabit connection, that capability was especially welcome for meeting the demands of video professionals that need those speeds for pulling uncompressed video files from network attached storage, as well as other professional users that may have 10 gigabit available in the office. Processor : GFXBench 5.0 Metal GPR (Frames Per Second- higher is better)The older Mac mini could also be configured with a 10 gigabit ethernet connection, but the new M1 mini only offers standard ethernet. But we can't discount the possibility that Apple opted for the now universal standard instead of Thunderbolt 4 because it's a proprietary Intel connection, and the Apple/Intel relationship is profoundly different now that Apple is migrating away from Intel-based Macs. It's also backwards compatible with USB 3.2 and USB 2.0, but that's less of a concern thanks to the two USB 3.0 connections already offered by the Mac mini.This is also notable in part because Apple – an early adopter of Thunderbolt technology – has not switched to Thunderbolt 4, likely because the development of the M1 processor focused on the well-established Thunderbolt 3 standard instead of the new Thunderbolt 4. Essentially, the once disparate USB and Thunderbolt standards have merged, and Thunderbolt 3 is more or less interchangeable with USB 4. USB 4 uses a USB type-C connector, offers 40 gigabits per second of speed and supports power delivery up to 100 watts, all specs that sound extremely familiar if you've read up on the details of Thunderbolt 3. While that may leave some users scratching their heads – Thunderbolt and USB were initially competing formats – the recently released USB 4 standard conforms to most of the Thunderbolt 3 specs. And it makes good on that promise thanks to it's 5 nanometer process technology, which lets the Apple design fit more capability into the one CPU.At the heart of the M1 processor are 8 processing cores: Four "Performance Cores" for raw performance, and four "Efficiency Cores" that can handle moderately demanding tasks without the same sort of power draw. It's clearly designed to be a one-chip solution to every bottleneck in modern PC designs. It combines processing and graphics onto the same system on a chip (SoC) and also packs in other features, like a secure enclave for security, unified memory for utilizing RAM more efficiently, and an integrated storage controller with accelerated cryptography for faster, more secure storage. We'll get into that more later.The chip itself is a 3.2 GHz processor with 16 billion transistors squeezed onto its silicon. It's the same processor found in the new MacBook Air and MacBook Pro, and by offering that identical hardware the Mac mini promises more or less identical performance. It's worth noting that Big Sur has to do double duty supporting both Mac and Intel processors, and includes Rosetta 2, which translates apps designed for Intel x86 hardware for use on the ARM-based M1 processor. Mac mini with M1 review: macOS Big Sur and Rosetta 2On the software side, the Mac mini comes with Big Sur, Apple's latest iteration of Mac OS and the first one built with Apple's processing hardware in mind. Compared to the prior Intel-based graphics solution, Intel Iris UHD Graphics 630, Apple promises dramatically faster performance for things like video rendering, image editing, and even gaming. It is the typical mini PC in that sense, and in this case the prototypical Mac desktop. But it's not 100% compatible with everything, so hiccups may arise as you get your own selection of preferred programs loaded up on your new Mac mini.But in the big shift from Intel to Apple Silicon, Mac mini is the reasonable place to start with this transition, given that the tiny PC is built to leverage laptop grade processing hardware in a compact desktop form factor. It's a technical tool to make everything play nicely while Apple balances two very different systems, providing equal capability to both until Apple is able to fully transition to Apple Silicon for all Macs sometime in the next couple of years.It works well enough that you'll (almost) never notice the difference, unless you use one of a handful of apps that flat out aren't supported, like x86 virtualization software (like Parallels or VMWare Fusion). The best dvd ripper for macWhile we will be comparing the Mac mini with other mini PCs, this is one instance where we may also point out interesting similarities and differences with Apple's latest laptops, the MacBook Air and Apple MacBook Pro, which both utilize the same processing hardware.Our informal evaluation starts with web browsing, and when browsing across more than a dozen Safari tabs and watching 4K video on YouTube, there was no noticeable slowing of performance. It's also a great test case for what the M1 chip can really do. With 256GB of flash storage, it's the cheapest Mac you can get. Mac mini with M1 review: PerformanceOur review unit of the Mac mini is the new standard base model, equipped with the Apple M1 processor and 8GB of RAM. ![]() Here, the Mac mini scored 566 points. But it again falls in between the slower Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n (20:23) and the faster Nvidia Quadro-equipped Intel NUC 9 Pro (8:23) The Mac mini was faster with the native app.Looking at a different real-world application, we use the PugetBench 30-minute Photoshop challenge, which simulates using the system for graphics work. The MacBook Pro was slightly faster (7:46) and the MacBook Air a bit behind at 9:08.Rerunning the Handbrake test with the Intel-friendly version using Rosetta 2, the Mac mini did the same task in 12:38, significantly slower than when using the Apple-optimized version. Using the Apple Silicon friendly Handbrake 1.4, the Mac mini finished its task in 8 minutes 11 seconds. The Mac mini falls somewhere between the two, but easily ranks on the high-end for mini PCs.Getting into a more real-world comparison of processing muscle, we turn to Handbrake, testing how quickly a system can transcode a 4K video clip to 1080p. Mac mini with M1 review: Price and configurationsPerhaps the most unexpected part of Apple's announcement of the new Mac mini was the move to a lower price, dropping the cost of the base model from $799 to $699.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorKenneth ArchivesCategories |